SAMPLE FORMAT · NAMES & CLINIC WITHHELD

Public-Record Compliance Snapshot

What your roster report looks like

Built from federal & state public records for a real 7-clinician ABA practice

Clinic name and clinician names withheld in this shared sample

Prepared by Raservent · Example screening · 7 clinical staff reviewed

5
Fully verified, no findings
2
Flagged for review
0
Confirmed OIG exclusions
1
Potential match ruled out

Roster screening results

ClinicianRoleNPI on fileNPI statusPractice locationOIG exclusion
Clinician 1
BCBA-D
Founder / CEO Verified Active Matches ✓ Clear
Clinician 2
BCBA
Operations Director Verified Active Matches ✓ Clear
Clinician 3
BCBA, LBA
Clinical Director Verified Active Matches ✓ Clear
Clinician 4
BCBA, LBA
Asst. Clinical Director Verified Active Matches ✓ See note 3
Clinician 5
BCBA, LBA
Behavior Analyst Verified Active Matches ✓ Clear
Clinician 6
BCBA, LBA
Clinical Development Verified Active Mismatch — see note 1 Clear
Clinician 7
BCBA, LBA
Behavior Analyst Not located See note 2 Clear (by name)

How to read this: “Clear” = no match on the OIG exclusion list. “Active” = NPI is live in the federal registry with a Behavior Analyst taxonomy. Flags are not allegations — they are items worth a 2-minute confirmation. In your report, every row shows the clinician’s real name and NPI.

Review notes

Note 1 — Practice-address mismatch: This clinician’s NPI is active and correctly typed as a Behavior Analyst, but the registered practice location is a different city than where they currently work. Usually this just means the NPPES address was never updated after a move — but stale NPI addresses are a common cause of Medicaid claim denials, so it’s worth a quick update.
Note 2 — No NPI located: No active Behavior Analyst NPI was found under this clinician’s name in the practice’s state. Either the NPI is filed under a different spelling, or one hasn’t been registered yet. If they render billable services, this is worth confirming before the next claim cycle.
Note 3 — Potential exclusion match, ruled out: The OIG exclusion list contained an entry for a similar name. On inspection it was a different individual — different city, a government-employee exclusion, with no NPI — and did not match this clinician’s NPI, location, or provider type. Verdict: not the same person; cleared. This is the kind of false positive a name-only screen would wrongly flag, and exactly what manual disambiguation is for.

What your full report includes

This sample shows two of the five screening layers. Your complete roster report includes:

Want this run for your roster?

Reply “yes” to the email and I’ll send the complete report — all your clinical staff, every layer, real names, sources — within a couple of days. No cost, no obligation.

Methodology & sources

Important

This snapshot is compiled solely from public records and is provided for informational and verification purposes. Name-based matches on the OIG LEIE are potential matches only and require confirmation against identifiers (SSN/DOB) before any adverse action, per OIG guidance. “Flagged for review” items are not findings of wrongdoing; they indicate a record that warrants confirmation. Raservent is not affiliated with CMS, OIG, the BACB, or any state licensing board. Verify all results against primary sources before relying on them for credentialing or billing decisions.